The Black History Month Audit: Advancing Equity for Black Employees at Work
Introduction
This 8-question audit aims to assist organizations in critically evaluating their commitments and actions towards fostering a more inclusive and equitable environment for their Black employees. As we honor the rich heritage and contributions of the Black community throughout February, it is crucial to reflect upon the ongoing challenges still faced by many Black, and systemically marginalized identity-groups, in the workplace. By undertaking this audit, your organization can consider ways to intentionally address disparities, genuinely promote diversity, and ensure that all employees are given equitable opportunities to thrive and succeed.
However, before proceeding, there are a few important things to note regarding my personal perspective and motivation for writing this piece:
While I do not believe this conversation or list of questions is solely relevant to the plight of Black employees, I do hope to model the importance of being intentional when it comes to naming the unique barriers that exist as a result of our socially and historically assigned identities. Based on where you are positioned, racial justice or equity may not be at the forefront of your cause. Nevertheless, understanding how constructs of racial oppression are reflected in identity-centric oppression of all kinds, creates a framework by which we can better understand what dismantling and re-imagining these constructs might look like for all of us.
The political conversation around race and racial equity has not been lost on me. As a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion consultant, I recognize that the efforts of my profession are under scrutiny—now, more than ever. In choosing to specifically name Black identity as an area of intentional focus in employment equity, some may consider my lens too narrow, obsolete, or discriminatory. I do not intend to spend time invalidating those perspectives, but rather offering a reframe. As a Black-identifying person writing about and from a (not to be confused with THE) lens of the Black experience, every question included in this audit was derived from some aspect of my own experience or similar experiences trending across my networks of Black friends, colleagues, and acquaintances who are currently, or have been employed. Representation, pay equity, inclusion, opportunities for mobility, microaggressions, bias, belonging, and systemic/institutional accountability, are all areas of perpetual harm for many Black team members across region, profession, organization and title.
These are not easy or quick conversations to have; and not every individual or organization is ready or feels the need to have them. That is not a decision I can make for you. However, for those who are ready—to ignite change, to challenge the status quo, and to champion equity, this is a resource intended to empower and help guide you on your journey. This audit is my call to action for all those—namely with positions of decision-making and investment privilege and power—to break down the barriers, name and dismantle systemic biases, demand spaces of inclusion; and help rewrite the perpetual narrative and practices of inequity that have been allowed to persist. If that isn’t your aim, then this isn’t for you.
The Audit
-
Metrics provide tangible data that can show the actual outcomes and results of our initiatives and efforts. They allow organizations to track changes over time and compare them against set targets or benchmarks. For example, organizations can analyze metrics related to the representation and advancement of Black employees, such as the percentage of Black employees in leadership positions of the promotion rates of Black employees compared to other demographics. By monitoring these metrics, organizations can identify any disparities or gaps in representation and advancement opportunities. This data can be useful in identifying systemic barriers or biases that may be hindering progress towards racial equity. It allows organizations to take proactive steps to address these issues (i.e. revising hiring practices, creating development programs targeting underrepresented groups, or implementing mentorship and sponsorship initiatives. Furthermore, tracking metrics makes room for accountability and provides a basis for continuous improvement. It allows organizations to hold themselves accountable for the progress made in promoting racial equity. In addition, by regularly reviewing and analyzing the data organizations an gain valuable insights into the effectiveness of their strategies and initiatives. This information can ground and guide decision making and enable organizations to refine their approaches, allocate resources effectively, and prioritize actions that will have the greatest impact.
-
It is essential for organizations to recognize that bias can unintentionally seep into performance, talent, and promotional review processes, leading to unequal opportunities and hindering the advancement of socially marginalized individuals and communities To mitigate bias in these processes, leaders and decision-makers should be skilled-up and educated about the various types of biases that can influence their judgements. They should also be encouraged to actively challenge their own biases by seeking diverse perspectives and opinions. This can be achieved by promoting diversity on review committees and ensuring that decision-making panels include individuals from different backgrounds and identities. This helps to reduce the likelihood of biases dominating the process. Implementing standardized evaluation criteria and performance metrics can also help decrease bias by providing objective measurable factors for assessment. These criteria should be based on job-related skills and competencies rather than subjective or personal opinions. Organizations should establish a system of checks and balances to ensure fairness and consistency in the review processes. This can include having multiple evaluators or implementing calibration sessions where decision-makers discuss and align their assessments to minimize potential bias. Overall, mitigating bias in our processes requires a proactive and continuous effort. Leaders must be quipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to recognize and address bias, while organizations should implement structural changes and promote a culture of inclusivity and accountability.
-
This question helps to shed light on systemic inequalities and biases that may exist within decision-making spaces. Historically, marginalized groups, including Black communities, have been underrepresented and excluded from positions of power and influence. By asking this question, we can bring attention to the lack of diversity and inclusion in these spaces—which is a necessary step towards addressing and rectifying disparities. Studies have consistently shown that diverse teams and inclusive environments lead to better outcomes and decision quality. By overlooking and excluding Black voices and perspectives, organizations and decision makers are missing out on valuable insights, experiences, and expertise that could significantly enhance their goals and results.
-
Addressing microaggressions in the workplace is crucial for creating an inclusive and equitable environment. Microaggressions are subtle, often unintentional acts or statements that marginalize, belittle, or discriminate against community members based on their race, ethnicity, or other social identity group. These acts can perpetuate racialized hierarchies and can have a significant impact on the experiences and opportunities of Black employees. By asking the question of whether organizations account for, call out, and rectify microaggressions, we acknowledge the importance of recognizing and addressing these harmful behaviors. It demonstrates a commitment to fostering a workplace culture that values and respects the diversity of its members. Accounting for microaggressions involves acknowledging that they are real and can manifest throughout the workplace in many ways. It requires organizations to create awareness among employees about the impact of microaggressions and the importance of treating everyone with respect and dignity. Calling out microaggressions means actively challenging and addressing these behaviors when they occur. It involves providing employees with the tools and resources to identify and respond to microaggressions appropriately. This can include trainings, workshops, or space to practice open discussions about biases and stereotypes. Rectifying microaggressions involves taking concrete actions to address the harm caused by these behaviors. This may include implementing disciplinary measures for repeat offenders, providing support and resources for affected individuals, and creating a safe space for open dialogue regarding racial issues and disparities within the organization. It is important to note that addressing microaggressions is an ongoing process that requires continuous effort and commitment at both personal and collective levels By consistently evaluating and improving their practices, we can all contribute to creating a workplace culture that is free from racialized hierarchies and fosters equality and inclusion for all employees.
-
This question is important because it helps identify whether there is equal opportunity for advancement and growth for Black employees. Bottom line, when there is diverse representation, it signifies that the organization values and promotes inclusivity, fairness, and equal access to opportunities for all employees. Having diverse representation at all levels also brings a variety of perspectives and experience to the table, which can lead to better decision-making, innovation, and overall organizational performance. It allows different voices to be heard and considered, leading to a more inclusive and dynamic process and environment.
-
Asking this question is important because it highlights potential disparities and inequities in representation and opportunities within the organization. By recognizing and addressing these disparities, organizations can work towards fostering a more diverse and inclusive workplace. There could be several reasons why such disparities exists. It might indicate systemic barriers, biases (overt or unconscious) that prevent Black team members from accessing certain roles or opportunities within the organization. It could also be reflective of historical exclusion, lack of representation in leadership positions, or limited networking opportunities. Understanding the reasons behind these disparities is crucial for organizations to address any structural or cultural issues that my be contributing to this imbalance. It requires a commitment to evaluating hiring practices, promotion opportunities, and creating a more inclusive environment that values diversity.
-
Ensuring equitable pay for Black employees is foundational to promoting fairness while addressing historical disparities related to compensation, the racial wealth gap, and economic mobility. Even more, pay equity fosters a sense of trust and true equality, which can 1) lead to higher morale and engagement while, 2) helping to reduce financial barriers that adversely impact the holistic well-being of Black employees. Directly connected to the conversation of pay equity are opportunities that promote career development and position team members to acquire skills (often transferable), that will help them advance. By directly asking about initiatives and programs, we acknowledge that systemic barriers have historically hindered the career growth of Black employees, and that proactive steps must be taken to correct this imbalance.
-
Asking this question acknowledges that unique experiences and challenges that Black team members may face in the workplace. It demonstrates a commitment to understanding and addressing and potential biases or barriers that may hinder their sense of belonging and overall job satisfaction Fostering a culture of intentional belonging means actively working towards creating an environment where Black team member feel valued, supported, and included. It involves promoting initiatives such as targeted mentorship programs, employee resource groups, and anti-bias training. By asking about the satisfaction scores of Black/non-white team members—specifically, compared to their white counterparts—organizations can gauge whether their efforts to foster a culture of intentional belonging are effective for everyone. Satisfaction scores provide valuable insights into how black team members’ perceive their workplace experiences and whether they feel heard, respected, and treated fairly. If satisfaction scores do not reflect a positive response to the question, it may indicate areas where improvements are needed. This could involve further examining policies and practices to identify and address any systemic biases or barriers, fostering open and honest dialogue with Black team members to understand their concerns and needs, and implementing targeted interventions to improve their overall experience at work.
Conclusion
This audit can be leveraged as a tool that can drive significant change and promote equity for Black employees in the workplace. Committing to ongoing evaluation and improvement, equips leaders with justification and insights to make meaningful progress towards true racial equity; and create a workplace where everyone has the opportunity to excel. Bringing awareness to barriers and biases, skills up individuals and teams to implement targeted strategies dedicated to creating a more inclusive and empowering environment. Organizations can foster a culture that values and supports the contributions of all employees—not just some—through robust diversity training, mentorship programs, and fair hiring practices. By asking questions like those posed in this Black History Month audit, we can inspire a collective commitment to equality, ensuring that ALL employees are not just seen and heard, but truly valued and celebrated at work!